“The 2000s remakes all got a bit too clever”, sniffed SAW’s Mike Stock years later. A touch of bitterness there perhaps – the people involved with this were as likely to rep for Pictures Of Starving Children Sell Records as Band Aid II – but the man had a point. The Band Aid 20 remake is an overstuffed mess, groaning as it tries to cram everything it can think of about British music and Band Aid itself into five tedious, pompous minutes.
This bloating is one of its two big differences from the 1984 and 1989 versions. Those records were vocal lucky dips but the sound of each kept closely to a then-dominant style: moody synth rock or tinny drum machine pop. On this version producer Nigel Godrich makes the record suit its BPI highlights reel cast, a song which opens with sad pianos and Coldplay’s Chris Martin detours via rock, pop, grime and metal and winds up in an extended Jools Holland’s Hootenanny style jam.
Some of this is correction for previous neglect – whatever its merits as a record, back in 1985 “We Are The World” put Band Aid to shame in terms of integration. A record about Africa by an almost entirely white British cast raised questions (and eyebrows) even then, and by 2004 they couldn’t be brushed away by an angry Geldof. But when people commented that there were almost no Black musicians on the original “Do They Know It’s Christmas?” the point was that the UK pop establishment of the mid-80s was unthinkingly, reflexively racist, not that the song itself required Travis’ producer to find room for a rap and a gospel finish.
But the scale of this version is also a tacit acknowledgement that there isn’t a centre to UK music any more, no dominant pop sound to celebrate. This single sold a million at a moment when most number 1s barely shifted a tenth of that. You could certainly look at the Band Aid 20 line up and argue that there’s a shared sensibility to Dido, Coldplay, Travis, Lemar, Will Young, the Bedingfields and others, and if you were mean you might suggest that sensibility is one of unproblematic, export-ready mediocrity. But to its credit the line-up finds room for some trickier characters – the guys from Radiohead are genuinely unexpected additions, The Darkness’ cartoonish bonhomie doesn’t fit the coffee-table vibe either, and then there’s Dizzee Rascal.
At the time this charted I assumed most of this entry would be about Dizzee – it seemed impossible he’d ever be at No.1 again, Mercury Prize or no. After years – decades! – of the British music industry neglecting homegrown Black talent, the speed with which they embraced Dizzee Rascal seems astonishing. “I Luv U” was a bomb-burst of noise, invention, attitude and spite – people who’d been following the underground evolution of grime for years were shocked by how new, how hard, how fully realised it sounded. And for once the sclerotic biz actually recognised a major talent, and within 18 months he’d won the top award and was fast-tracked into a studio with Paul McCartney and Bono? Impossible. But here he is.
Dizzee treated Band Aid as a half hour’s work – they called him up, told him what they needed, he wrote some bars, wrote a few more on request, job done. And while he wasn’t a household name, his presence on the record, the way he was allowed to update its hallowed text, was vital as proof this wasn’t just a nostalgia exercise. The truth was, Band Aid 20 needed Dizzee Rascal a great deal more than Dizzee Rascal needed Band Aid 20.
It helps that his simple contribution is the best thing about the record by a distance. His spot is crassly inserted – everything pauses for a Representative Of The Youth to have his say – but his casual London squawk cuts through the rest of the swaying and mic-hugging anyway. And there’s a harsh clarity to the question he asks – “if the tables were turned, would you survive?” that gets straight to one of the reasons humans are drawn to help one another. It has a similar weight to the famous Bono line but it’s better, managing to not imply this is a zero-sum game.
Who got to sing the Bono line was a minor, but illuminating subplot. The two men slated to do it were Robbie Williams and Justin Hawkins, the participants keenest on tongue-in-cheek, performative rock-star-ness. To me this say Team Band Aid knew that “tonight thank God it’s them instead of you” was a bit of a liability, and planned to lean into that notoriety (Band Aid II had palmed it off on a Goss). Either singer would surely have been taken by Bono as a deliberate insult – in any case, he insisted on doing it himself, got his way, and oversang it anyway.
This miniature brouhaha does point up the second major difference between Band Aid and Band Aid 20. In 1984 the motley group were recording a song. Now they’re covering a classic, making Band Aid 20 as much like the charity run-throughs of “Let It Be” and “Ferry Cross The Mersey” as its own original. But more than that – as is clear watching the video, Band Aid 20 is a cover version not just of a song but of an event. Everything about it feels rehearsed – the sombre faces of pop musicians as they’re shown videos of famine victims; the in-performance mugging for the camera; the laughs and smiles of friends made and remade; even Justin Hawkins’ pelvic-thrusting his guitar.
It’s pop as historical re-enactment, stars doing the kind of things stars do in a Band Aid video and hoping for some of the original enchantment to rub off. But just as in 1989, “Do They Know It’s Christmas?” is too gothically strange a song – and Band Aid too tied to its hubristic, passionate moment – for that to work. As a one-off, it was remarkable. As a tradition, it feels increasingly hollow.
Score: 3
[Logged in users can award their own score]
I absolutely loathed this version at the time, and listening back to it now, I still hate it. A mish mash of genres that just doesn’t work at all. Band Aid 2 was a better effort than this – it might have been cheap, lazy and unimaginative but this tried too hard to be clever, and proved that sometimes less is more if you’re going to redo a classic charity record.
Luckily Geldof managed to redeem himself with Band Aid 30, which worked much better despite the god awful Sam Smith and Rita Ora oversinging their lines.
My thoughts exactly.
I was too young for Band Aid, but I recall Band Aid II in 1989, mainly because I was a Kylie fan and my sister was a Jason Donovan fan. Once January 1990 arrived, Band Aid II was quickly forgotten and later dismissed, and I don’t think I heard it again until 2004.
There was no Band Aid 10 in 1994 or Band Aid 15 in 1999 (but it’s fun to think about who would likely have appeared on it), so it was all very exciting when Band Aid 20 was announced. I was in my early 20s, so this time I’d remember everything about it, from the speculation about who would appear on it to who sang each line to how long it was number 1 for.
Like most of my friends and colleagues, my reaction to Band Aid 20 on first hearing/watch was: “Is that it?” It was just so underwhelming. The night after it was released, I heard Band Aid II on the radio here in Ireland, quite possibly its first airplay in 15 years, and afterwards, the DJ said: “Remember when we thought this was the worst version of Band Aid?”
In the second-last paragraph, Tom explains what went wrong – the performers involved were far too aware of what they were involved in. If you watch the original Band Aid, you’ll see a rag-tag group of singers turning up at a studio on a Sunday morning (most looking like they hadn’t been to bed) to record a single, not really knowing what it would become. In 2004, while the recording took place on a Sunday morning again, none of those involved looked remotely bleary-eyed. Yes, they might have dressed down a little, but there had been visits to hair and makeup on the way to the studio. Unfortunately, the more polished appearance of the singers was accompanied by a smugness that wasn’t there in either 1984 or 1989.
There was also the unpleasantness of the dispute between Bono and Justin Hawkins over the “Well tonight thank God it’s them, instead of you” line. It was just so tacky that egos got in the way when a charity single.
Finally, I didn’t like how Dido and Robbie Williams recorded their parts remotely. Back in 1984, Boy George famously flew from NYC to London to record his part, and in 2004, it just felt like those singers who didn’t come to London were thinking: “Yeah, I want to be involved because it’s good publicity, but I’m not going to the bother of going to London.” If they couldn’t be there in London, they shouldn’t have been on it…David Bowie had to miss out in 1984, so why couldn’t Dido and Robbie? I doubt it would have made a difference.
After all that, I do have one positive thing to say – Band Aid 20 denied Ronan Keating the 2004 Christmas number 1.
“This single sold a million at a moment when most number 1s barely shifted a tenth of that.” My mother bought two copies. One to listen to and one to keep sealed, believing that it was worth securing as a souvenir which would one day it would be ‘worth something’. But I talked her into just letting me have that copy as my own to listen to. My other dominant memory is her not knowing who Dizzee is and consulting my younger auntie – less than five years later we had Tongue n’ Cheek in the car as (IIRC) her first rap album. So for that I do believe Band Aid 20 was a turning point – Dizzee’s verse was a talking point among people who had not heard of him or grime.
This is a muddled old record though. I do welcome the Rockestra Theme-type guitar dual towards the end but the final 40 seconds of campfire whoops and cheering (feed the waa-ooorld) irritate me so much that whatever peripheral fondness I’ve had based on who appears begins fading rapidly. Though that artist-based fondness still puts it firmly ahead of Band Aid 30 in my book (and I mean, Radiohead’s front of house? Even if Goldrich is producing, what the hell?) Note also that Damon Albarn was filmed being, and credited as, “tea boy” (missed opportunity for Rick Astley on Band Aid II there) but then was one of the most prominent critics of Live 8 London’s limited black representation.
Sadly the next gen AI previously responsible for the “See also” links has gone underground to start work on Band Aid 40, so it’s up to me to remind everyone of The Secret History of Band Aid
Kind of why I find some merit in this? Mind you, I also preferred the Girls Aloud version of ISbY to that of the Pretenders. Am I subconsciously trolling the other commenters? Or have I just looked ahead to see what horrors await in Q1 of 2005* and adjusted my expectations accordingly?
Be that as it may, 6!
* At the same time, I sincerely believe the only way Band Aid II could compare favourably to this version was the fact that it followed the worst number one of all
Does anyone know how well this single performed globally? I ask because I can’t seem to find any data on it, and obviously the original Band Aid single picked up attention outside the UK as well.
The only time I saw the video for this and heard the song was in a bar in New Zealand that Christmas season. My wife-to-be and I stopped our conversation, paused drinking for a few moments to take it in, went a bit quiet once it had finished, then finally both agreed that it wasn’t very good.
Listening back again, I think that’s an understatement. There’s just so much wrong with it. Stylistically it feels behind the times in a way the 1984 release wasn’t. Those polite, earnest vocals and bashing piano lines sound more like 1998 stool-rock than anything 2004 had to say for itself. The mood and tone is more like Travis caught under storm clouds than a rallying cry for a cause. The guitar lines are also horribly jarring, like interruptions from a technician who didn’t realise the studio red light was on.
The whole thing (video and song) also drips earnestness rather than concern. I’ve no doubt that many of the people involved were there for the right reasons, but it doesn’t come across in the performances. There’s an absence of emotion, as if the lyrics are being performed from idiot boards being held up by someone in the studio.
Nonetheless, it’s fascinating. It does, by and large, upend most aspects of the original arrangement and try to create something different. It sounds a bit more world-weary and smudged around the edges, as if to say “20 years down the line, and we’re still having to do this”. Sadly, failed experiments can be interesting without actually being pleasurable to listen to, and I certainly wouldn’t dip into this version again out of choice.
Wikipedia is a bit messy on this. It doesn’t have the standard Discography section with chart stats for any of the Band Aid projects, but if you search for the “Do They Know It’s Christmas?” entry you’ll find the info for all the various versions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_They_Know_It%27s_Christmas%3F#Charts
(and yes, it was an international hit, obviously not on the scale of the original one, but bigger than the second one. I’d be surprised if it stuck in anyone’s memory for much longer than the few weeks it was in the charts in any given country)
Thanks for that! I really couldn’t dig it up.
Number 72 in France! Well, they knew.
Oh yeah I almost forgot – 3/10 is far too generous a score for anything involving Joss Stone’s horribly forced oversinging.
Good cause and all that, but a truly wretched and grim listening experience, in my view. It’s the dreaded 1/10, I’m afraid.
Also, what is going on with that cover art? It looks like a corrupted jpg of a supermarket Christmas bag for life.
Damien Hirst is going on! I did think the artwork might generate a paragraph of its own…
I only download the sleeve once I’m actually loading it up so there’s never really a mention of it – probably should have changed my habits here but like Damon’s role as tea boy sometimes a hard stare suffices.
Blimey, did he do the artwork then? Looks like he spent about five minutes on it.
He actually did do the initial artwork for the single which was depicting a starving child sat on the lap of the Grim Reaper. Which was dropped on fears that kids would find it scary.
Big Active – some sort of art design company – did the final artwork you see here.
Hard disagree – for me, Dizzee’s rap is the point when the record goes from being bland and tepid to becoming embarrassingly bad. There’s obviously a place for grime in a song about subject matter like this, but this just felt like middle-aged men desperately trying to crowbar in a rap in a song where it didn’t fit at all, just to be down with the kids.
On the other hand, the rap does at least make it more memorable than Band Aid 30, which I can’t remember anything about.
The best thing about this is that it means that members of Ash, Divine Comedy, Supergrass, The Darkness and Travis at least got to appear on a number 1, which they wouldn’t have otherwise.
2/10.
Oh I think you’re absolutely right about the existence of the rap and the fact they thought “yes, this needs a rap!” being embarrassing. I just think Dizzee does the best anyone could with that particular brief, and the fact he keeps it extremely simple puts the rest of the record’s overstuffed performances to shame.
Yeah, him and The Darkness’s guitar fanfare are literally all I remembered about this.
My band at the time were involved in a local bands’ re-recording of this which is maybe even still knocking round somewhere in the mulch layer of the internet. Our line was ‘where nothing ever grows/no rain nor rivers flow’.
The perils of charity single as self-conscious event laid staggeringly plain. Dizzee Rascal’s turn felt tacked-on and WTF at the time to me but from this distance it’s clear it’s the highlight of the record by a long way. (It’s not the last time a London rapper’s bonus content will provide the highlight of a charity cover #1, but the second time it’ll be as the introduction so you don’t have to listen to the rest of the song!)
In his Band Aid II review, Tom made one really sharp point:
And here’s Band Aid 20 doubling down on the same mistake, but maybe even still harder thanks to a production that’s part landfill indie, part variety pack, all “taking it seriously.” And here’s Dizzee Rascal with a hurried, powerful intervention that’s actually far more in keeping with the spirit of the original. It’s what makes this a 2 and not a 1.
Not much I can add to what has already been said. The problem with this version is that it’s trying so painfully hard to update the formula and make it relevant for 2004 – and thus fails miserably.
The most frustrating thing about DTKIC 2004 is the need to recycle. With all the talent involved couldn’t somebody have written a new Christmas song to raise money for charity? The answer is probably yes and may well have been very good. The critical point is would anybody have wanted to buy it, at least in the same quantities as they would a rehash of a 20 year old song?
Apologies if anybody has mentioned this but there was another re-tread that would happen the following summer which was Live 8, the twenty year celebration of Live Aid. Which was, to be fair, was a significant event – far more so than this record. But I remember that Scissor Sisters would get a shellacking for throwing a new song into their set instead of playing the hits.
This is likely something I’ll return to when we get into the Elvis re-issues but we are starting to see a problem which predates the download era – at some point the public stopped being interested in new music.
At the same time this version of Band Aid was released, the American singer\actress Sheila Ferguson used her stint on I’m A Celebrity to release a cover of Ultra Nate’s 1998 hit New Kind of Medicine for the Christmas chart in the hope the I’m A Celebrity fan base would buy the record.
Whereas Ultra Nate’s original had made the Top 20, Sheila, despite Steve Wright playing it on Radio 2 and the I’m A Celebrity publicity, couldn’t even make the Top 75. Her version stalled outside the Top 100 and The Sun pointed out it sold 55 copies on 1st day of release to over 50,000 for Band Aid.
Completely agree with JDSWORLD, the performers in this are too self aware and knowing. Also, egos are probably stroked at being picked; whereas the original seemed naive, unknowing, and better for it.
Not to mention it was packed with genuine superstars.
This didn’t pass me by due to the huge publicity, but it was incredibly fleeting. In the era of downloads and streaming it is the original which has stood the test of time.
The other versions seem obsolete.
The cluttered, chaotic ending also doesn’t help.
@musicality; “the performers in this are too self aware and knowing. Also, egos are probably stroked at being picked [..] The cluttered, chaotic ending also doesn’t help.”
I felt very much that way at the time, and it was the ending in particular that cemented that impression for me. That descent into manufactured, contrived “live” informality always felt very smug and self-contratulatory me- pop stars being very much aware this was a Big Important Historical Event trying to mirror history by replicating a “Hey Jude” sort of vibe, and instead coming off as indulgent and irritating.